|
The never ending Iraq war
Hmmm .... I wonder. Is this really a statement from the Iraqi government? I suspect that Emperor Obama is pulling all the strings here, and if Emperor Obama wants to keep American troops in Iraq he will use the excuse that the puppet government of Iraq is demanding it, not that OBAMA wants to keep the troops in Iraq. U.S. offers to keep 10,000 troops in Iraq in '12 Baghdad must ask for troops to stay past Dec. pullout deadline by Lara Jakes - Jul. 6, 2011 12:00 AM Associated Press BAGHDAD - The White House is offering to keep up to 10,000 troops in Iraq next year, U.S. officials say, despite opposition from many Iraqis and key Democratic Party allies who demand that President Barack Obama bring home the American military as promised. Any extension of the military's presence, however, depends on a formal request from Baghdad, which must weigh questions about the readiness of Iraqi security forces against fears of renewed militant attacks and unrest if U.S. soldiers stay beyond the December pullout deadline. Iraq is not expected to decide until September at the earliest, when the 46,000 U.S. forces left in the country had hoped to start heading home. Already, though, the White House has worked out options to keep 8,500 to 10,000 active-duty troops in Iraq to continue training security forces during 2012, according to senior Obama administration and U.S. military officials in interviews with the Associated Press. The figures also were noted by foreign diplomats in Baghdad briefed on the issue. All spoke on condition of anonymity to frankly discuss the sensitive matter during interviews over the past two weeks. An e-mail statement Tuesday from Tommy Vietor, White House national-security spokesman, said there currently are "no plans" to keep U.S. troops in Iraq beyond the Dec. 31 withdrawal deadline. But Vietor said any request by Iraq to keep American forces "would be given serious consideration" by the White House. Any change in the U.S. military withdrawal timetable in Iraq, after more than eight years and more than 4,450 U.S. military deaths, could open up difficult political confrontations for Obama as pressure builds to close out the Iraq mission and stick to pledges to draw down troops in Afghanistan. The Senate's top Democrat, Sen. Harry Reid, told the AP that the high cost of keeping U.S. troops in Iraq, given a mounting U.S. debt crisis and Iraq's fledgling security gains, is no longer necessary. Reid, the Senate majority leader, estimated that nearly $1 trillion has been spent in Iraq since the U.S. invaded in 2003, including $50 billion this year. "As Iraq becomes increasingly capable, it is time for our own troops to return home by the end of the year and for these precious resources to be directed elsewhere," Reid, D-Nev., said in the statement. "There is no question that the United States must continue to provide support for the Iraqis as they progress, but now is the time for our military mission to come to a close." Reid was responding to a request for comment after 15 U.S. soldiers were killed in Iraq in June, mostly by Shiite militias, in the deadliest month for the American military there in two years. It was the first public statement by a top party leader to oppose Obama's policy in Iraq, and it may signal splintering Democratic support over his war planning just as he ramps up his 2012 re-election campaign. Though violence has dramatically dropped from just a few years ago, when Iraq teetered on the brink of civil war, attacks still take place almost daily. On Tuesday, Iraqi police said at least 37 people were killed when two bombs exploded outside a city council headquarters just north of Baghdad. Running for president in 2008, Obama promised to withdraw all troops from Iraq - what he had described years earlier as "a dumb war, a rash war." Shortly after he took office, he pledged to stick to a Dec. 31, 2011, deadline negotiated between Washington and Baghdad for all U.S. forces to leave Iraq. Recently, however, the door gradually has been opening to push the deadline. In May, former Defense Secretary Robert Gates signaled Obama is willing to keep troops in Iraq beyond December. Last week, Navy Vice Adm. William McRaven, nominated to command U.S. special-operations forces, said a small commando force should remain. Without a request from Iraq, fewer than 200 active-duty troops would stay at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad as military advisers, a role that is common for American diplomatic missions worldwide. More than 166,000 U.S. troops were in Iraq in October 2007, the peak of the Pentagon's surge. In Baghdad, the debate over whether U.S. troops should stay past the deadline is topic No. 1 for Iraq's government. Iraq's top military commander, Gen. Babaker Shawkat Zebari, has long maintained that Iraqi security forces need another decade of training and aid before they are ready to protect the country alone, especially its airspace and borders. Iraq sits on the fault line between Shiite powerhouse Iran and mostly Sunni nations across the rest of the Mideast, which share U.S. concerns about Iran's influence growing in Baghdad if American troops leave. Iraqi Kurds, who have long relied on American forces to protect them, are lobbying for U.S. troops to stay. But Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki refuses to publicly endorse a troop extension. One of his critical political allies, a Shiite movement headed by anti-American cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, has threatened widespread violence if troops stay. Sadr's militias once waged fierce attacks on U.S. forces. |