熱 天 氣 Warm Weather

Obama pretends to support peace in Afghanistan so he can be reelected in 2012.

But even with his alleged removal of 30,000 troops in two years the war will be just as large as when he entered office and escalated the American war effort.

Source

Obama: 30,000-plus surge troops leaving Afghanistan

Jun. 22, 2011 05:55 PM

Associated Press

WASHINGTON - Beginning to wind down a long and devastating war, President Barack Obama announced Wednesday night he was pulling home 33,000 troops from Afghanistan by next summer, withdrawing the "surge" of forces he had sent to rescue a flailing effort. Said Obama to a country eager for an exit: "The tide of war is receding."

A total of 10,000 troops will leave the war zone by the end of this year -- fulfilling Obama's promise -- and more than 20,000 additional forces will leave by the summer of 2012, shortly before the president will go before voters in search of a second term.

Still, almost 70,000 U.S. troops will remain in an unstable country, fighting in a war bound to see more Americans killed. Obama said they will leave at a steady pace, but the U.S. combat mission is not expected to end until December 2014 -- and even then, a sizable and enduring contingent may remain in a different role.

Obama's announcement from the White House came in a perilous political environment, with Americans soured on the war and the economy, many members of Congress pushing him to get troops home even faster, and his Republican presidential rivals taking shots at his leadership at every chance. Conceding the economic strain of waging war at a time of rising debt and fiscal constraint, Obama said it was time for America "to focus on nation building here at home."

The withdrawal is supported by the bold bottom-line claims of his security team: Afghanistan, training ground for the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on America, is no longer a launching pad for exporting terrorism and hasn't been for years. Yet the White House insists the U.S. must maintain a strong fighting force in Afghanistan for now to keep the country from slipping back into a haven for al-Qaida terrorists.

Obama said the materials recovered during the raid to get Osama bin Laden in Pakistan showed that the al-Qaida terror network was under deep strain. He said bin Laden himself expressed concern that his network would be unable to effectively replace senior leaders that had been killed.

The president declared, "We have put al-Qaida on a path to defeat, and we will not relent until the job is done."

Some fellow Democrats suggested Obama wasn't going fast enough. "We will continue to press for a better outcome," said House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California.

The president spoke for about 13 minutes from a silent East Room. It was a strategic moment for him to try to explain a turning point in the war effort without elevating it to a major Oval Office address -- more of a stay-the-course case of progress and resilience.

"Of course, huge challenges remain," the president said. "This is the beginning -- but not the end -- of our effort to wind down this war. We will have to do the hard work of keeping the gains that we have made while we draw down our forces and transition responsibility for security to the Afghan government."

Significant questions still loom, including whether Afghanistan's government and security forces will be up to enormous job within a few years.

Yet Obama made clear the United States was ready to move on from a decade defined by wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, at a cost at of thousands of lives lost and more than $1 trillion spent.

War monger John McCain will never shut up!!!!

Source

Afghan drawdown risky, McCain says

by Erin Kelly - Jun. 23, 2011 12:00 AM

Republic Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON - President Barack Obama is taking "an unnecessary risk" by withdrawing U.S. troops from Afghanistan at a faster rate than his military generals recommend, Sen. John McCain said Wednesday.

The president should leave the 33,000 troops in place through another fighting season in 2012 to bring eastern Afghanistan under control and reinforce the progress that has been made since the troop surge began 18 months ago, McCain said in an interview.

"As president, you have the power to overrule your military leaders, but at the same time my conclusion is that it creates an unnecessary risk of failure in Afghanistan," McCain said.

The Republican senator from Arizona said he could have supported a modest withdrawal of about 5,000 troops as advocated by Gen. David Petraeus and other military leaders.

McCain said he understood that Obama was under pressure from many in Congress who want to cut federal spending.

The war has cost U.S. taxpayers more than $440 billion over 10 years and has become increasingly unpopular with the public.

"Listen, I understand the war weariness," McCain said. "But we have had over 1,500 young Americans sacrifice their lives in this war, and we have to make sure that wasn't in vain."

On the other side, Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Tucson, said the president was not withdrawing enough troops fast enough.

The congressman said he believed the president should have announced the withdrawal of at least half of the approximately 100,000 U.S. troops in Afghanistan, with a timetable to withdraw the rest.

"This dribbling out of Afghanistan is not going to satisfy the American people, and I'm sure there's going to be a great deal of disappointment in Congress as well," Grijalva said.

Grijalva said his Arizona constituents have had enough of America's longest-running war.

"There has been an increasing voice from people who used to be supportive or neutral on the war who are now saying that we have a lot of problems here at home, we need to get people back to work, and we could use the money we're spending on this war to do just that," he said.

Support for the war has ebbed throughout the country. A Pew Research Center poll released Tuesday reported that 56 percent of those surveyed said the troops should be brought home as quickly as possible.